Verse of the Day
Showing posts with label signpost. Show all posts
Showing posts with label signpost. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 20, 2007

False Prophet Identified

"At that time if anyone says to you, 'Look, here is the Christ!' or, 'There he is!' do not believe it. For false Christs and false prophets will appear and perform great signs and miracles to deceive even the elect—if that were possible. See, I have told you ahead of time." -Matthew 24:23-25

Take a good look at the picture on the right - this is exactly what Jesus warned us about. This is a false prophet. This is a false Christ. Sounds crazy?

Meet Jose Luis de Jesus Miranda, a pastor in Miami who claims to be Jesus Christ incarnate. And he has the number 666 tattooed on his arm. Now that's odd. And the scary thing is that a lot of people believe him.

De Jesus preaches that there is no devil and no sin. I don't know what Bible he's preaching from, but the New International Version has a combined 466 specific references to "devil" and "sin," as well as 46 references to "Satan." And that's not including other references to the devil including "serpent," "beast," "evil one," etc. That's a lot of references to something that doesn't exist (did you know that cats are not mentioned in the Bible? yet they exist!).

Satan is the Great Deceiver, and perhaps the biggest lie he perpetrates is that he doesn't exist. Trust me, he does.

But wait, it gets even more twisted. Not only does De Jesus claim to be Christ incarnate, but also the antichrist! How can he be both?

Then there's the matter of the "666" tattooed on his arm. While the number 666 is associated with the devil, De Jesus claims it's all just a misunderstanding. Well, let's see. Revelation 13:18 states: "This calls for wisdom. If anyone has insight, let him calculate the number of the beast [the devil], for it is man's number. His number is 666." Sorry, there's no mistake about this verse; 666 is associated with Satan. Unfortunately, De Jesus' followers do not have the wisdom to discern that. In fact, De Jesus thinks the antichrist is a great guy.

De Jesus also preaches, "The Antichrist is not the devil; he's the being who replaces Jesus on Earth." True. The Antichrist is not the devil. 2 John 1:7 says, "Many deceivers, who do not acknowledge Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh, have gone out into the world. Any such person is the deceiver and the antichrist." But when Jesus ascended into heaven, he was not replaced by deceivers. The work of Christ was placed in the hands, feet, mouths, and hearts of his followers. Nor did Jesus leave us in a spiritual vacuum after he left, for he promised us in John 14:26 : "But the Counselor, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, will teach you all things and will remind you of everything I have said to you."

De Jesus - I wonder if that's his real name, or one he concocted to ease his deceit? But one thing is sure - he is an antichrist in the true definition. He shmoozes his congregation along the path of evil. They hear what they want to hear. He exploits their ignorance. By telling them there is no devil and no sin, they have no God to fear. In the end, he will only lead them - and himself - to destruction.

How do they allow this to happen to themselves? How do they allow this inherently evil man to control their very souls? Quite simple. They don't know their Bible. And Jose Luis de Jesus Miranda knows this.

If you wish, check out the full story on CNN.

Meanwhile, I close with this passage: "Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world." - 1 John 4:1

In other words, get into the Word, my friends. The Bible is your best protection against scheisters like Jim Jones, David Koresh, Joseph Smith, and Jose Luis de Jesus Miranda.

Keep watch, my brethren. Be vigilant.

Wednesday, February 7, 2007

What The...? The Defense of Marriage Initiative

I don't yell at the TV very often, but I did last night. Married couples would be required to have children within three years or their marriage would be annulled. What the...? Excuse me?

According to this news report, "Initiative 957 was filed by the Washington Defense of Marriage Alliance. That group was formed last summer after the state Supreme Court upheld Washington's ban on same-sex marriage."

Here's the details:

  • If passed by Washington voters, the Defense of Marriage Initiative would:
    add the phrase, “who are capable of having children with one another” to the legal definition of marriage;

  • require that couples married in Washington file proof of procreation within three years of the date of marriage or have their marriage automatically annulled;

  • require that couples married out of state file proof of procreation within three years of the date of marriage or have their marriage classed as “unrecognized;”

  • establish a process for filing proof of procreation; and

  • make it a criminal act for people in an unrecognized marriage to receive marriage benefits.¹

These people have absolutely no clue what a marriage is. And now that the people of the great state of Washington have spoken up and taken a stand in favor of marriage, this bunch of sore losers has taken their fight to a new low. Let's hope this initiative goes down in flames.



¹http://www.wa-doma.org/Default.aspx

Friday, January 12, 2007

Compelled to Receive a Blessing

Today we were at the Mayo Clinic Hospital for my wife's "routine" ERCP. While sitting the waiting room as she was being prepped, I spotted an elderly couple donning sweatshirts bearing the name of another United Methodist Church in the area and emblazoned with the UMC logo; they were obviously there in support of another patient and her spouse. I was intrigued.

After S was prepped for her procedure, I was allowed to go back and visit her before she was wheeled off. When I returned to the waiting room, the other couple was there, too. Although I felt no need for any spiritual healing, I did feel a compulsion that I needed to be witnessed to, and that God had crossed our paths today for a purpose. So I walked over and introduced myself.

Turned out that H and W belonged the Methodist church printed on their shirts (no surprise) and that H was the visitation pastor of that church. We had a delightful conversion for what was probably over an hour. Actually W had done most of the talking for both of them, but her pastor husband did share a synopsis of his ministerial resume. We found that we had mutual acquaintances and shared experiences. They have facilitated several of the Disciple Bible studies, which is interesting since I will be starting the Disciple I study next week.

The time came when the church member they were staying with was to go. We had a delightful time together. We said our good-byes and hugged each other. If for nothing else, I needed the fellowship. I was grateful for our time of sharing. What a blessing!

Wednesday, January 10, 2007

Can Iraq Really Get Tough?

"If the Iraqi government does not follow through on its promises, it will lose the support of the American people — and it will lose the support of the Iraqi people...The Prime Minister understands this" - President George W. Bush, 10 January 2007

Let us hope that the Iraqi Prime Minister understands the situatiion in his country - lest his fate will be similar to that of the late former president, Saddam Hussein.

In tonight's address to the nation [full transcript], President Bush acknowledged his full responsibility for the mistakes made in Iraq. He made it clear that the Iraqi government and the Iraqi people needed to take more responsibility for their own destiny. He also acknowledged it would probably be too difficult without a little extra help from 20,000 additional U.S. troops.

Both Prime Minister Maliki and President Bush have declared that the sectarian and political violence that has been ripping Iraq apart will no longer be tolerated. It's about damned time. Much bloodshed could have been avoided if this had been the official policy all along. Hopefully it's not too little too late.

This has been an unpopular war. But that's not President Bush's fault. He sincerely committed us and other nations to go in and liberate the Iraqi people. With the exception of the U.K. (who's now faltering in their support), our allies have given meager support, both militarily and in helping reconstruct Iraq. Even the so-called-almighty UN bailed out completely after the horrific bombing of their headquarters in Baghdad. Despite all that, Saddam Hussein was forced out of office and was eventually captured - mission accomplished! And Saddam was made to answer for a mere fraction of his crimes against humanity - at the hands of the Iraqi people.

Al-Qaeda and other radical Islamists decided to take advantage of the fog of war and fog it up even more. Add to that mix certain factions within Iraq who took advantage of the absence of the tyrannical Ba'ath regime. These are people who do not follow rules of engagement or abide by the Geneva Convention. They fight dirty. Americans typically do not. And when those few do, they get crucified in the world press for it. If America was truly bloodthirsty and uncaring, we could end this war in a matter of minutes.

I do not like this war, not one bit. But we cannot allow Iraq fall into the hands of an extremist regime - that would put the entire world at risk. Nor can we allow the war to be conducted in the manner that it has. The Iraqis have to get tough. We need to help them. Perhaps just toughening up the rules of engagement would be enough. I personally would even go as far as unconditional surrender.

Yes, this is an unpopular war. And President Bush has just gone double-or-nothing.